Search!

Calendar

« March 2010
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Last Comments

Steve (Broadband rates a…): I pay $30 US for a 768kb download connection in Kan…
Aaron (Proles.net is Sti…): Another spam prevention test thing…
Aaron (Renting market): Hrmm, let’s see… 9. People suffering from high ga…
Durf (Renting market): Take it farther! 7. People forced to rent farther o…
Aaron (Proles.net is Sti…): This is just a test to see if my various spam-preve…
Aaron (Stanford rolls ov…): Yeah, but they essentially only chose to do that (e…
Durf (Stanford rolls ov…): In defense of Stanford’s trust fund, the school has…
Richard (Stanford rolls ov…): I like your reply to the article about Stanford, es…
Aaron (Vaudeville Tech): Look on the bright side – at least they’re focusing…
Aaron (Spitzer disappoin…): I do agree that at least he’s focusing on punishing…

Last Referrers

Archives

01 May - 31 May 2006
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2006
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2006
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2006
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2006
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2007
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2007
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2007
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2007
01 May - 31 May 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2007
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2007
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2008
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2008
01 May - 31 May 2009

Links

Soy Code
Guppy's film reviews
Fedorpheux

Stuff

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.7: 'Dreadwind'
XML: RSS Feed
XML: Atom Feed
Spampoison
Creative Commons License

About

Bits of philosophy and other randomness.

Linkdump

+ 15 - 6 | § Flash craziness

Normally I don't just pass these along, but this one was pretty cool.

+ 12 - 7 | § Net Neutrality

If you've not heard of it, or even if you have, I suggest checking out SavetheInternet.com - the site name might sound overly lofty, but once you understand the issue and what is at stake you'll realize that it's really not.

+ 7 - 14 | § Jay Leno needs to...

...get his hands on these ads.

+ 9 - 11 | § Another "How America Views the World"

Several of these have floated around before, but this one was new to me, and amusing.

+ 13 - 7 | § Political Science Wiki

One last bit of shameless self-promotion (it is my website after all): Political Science Wiki, a new Wiki intended to be a repository for all things related to Political Science.

+ 10 - 6 | § So I've dedicated my life...

...to protecting the rights of artists, writers, musicians, photographers, filmmakers, and everyone in between. I'm Captain Copyright!

+ 10 - 11 | § "Incidental" copies of media

Big business wants you to pay full licensing fees for "incidental" copies of media - this means, even if you legally own an MP3, if you happen to copy/paste it or it gets cached or so forth, you'd be legally liable. Listening to an online radio station and the program automatically creates a temporary cache? Again, you'd be liable. Put shortly, this is one of the worst bills to face Congress in awhile (and that's really saying something). It's before some subcommittee right now, and if any of the folks on the list happen to be your Congress-critter I highly encourage you to let them know how you feel about this.

Some brief analysis so this merits a frontpage entry: as ridiculous as this is, it's also esoteric enough (technologically, that is: most people don't understand and don't care about what a "cache" is) that it could slip under the radar. If it does, I doubt it will be stringently enforced, firstly because it'd be impossible to do so and secondly because any attempt to do so would result in people becoming quite upset. So instead of unilateral enforcement, expect to see this as one of those things that's just piled on to the list of charges that undesirables already get in this country.

It's really a sad state of affairs when so many laws are essentially arbitrary clubs to be used by law enforcement and the government as they see fit. If you're already identified as a target of the government for whatever reason (good or bad, either way this method is wrong), you're susceptible to incredibly increased enforcement of laws and instrustion into your life. In short, this country is no longer about "equal protection under the law" - the inverse of this situation is also true, as government officials (all the way up the spectrum) tend to treat themselves and their actions as being above the law.

Admittedly this thinking is somewhat tangential to this particular law, but I think it's a pretty good example of what I'm talking about. Laws are no longer about the good of society and are instead about the good of whoever has the ear of the lawmakers (usually folks with money). Just another lesson for why, while pure communism doesn't work, capitalism isn't always so hot either...